Your email address will not be published. Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field. Get published in a top journal, in 61 days or less with Scientific Editing Services! Add your ORCID here. 0000-0002-7299-680X). Subject? Analysis of Peer Review and Acceptance Time (PRAT) of papers published in journals via preprints revealed the timing of … A great step to transparency and recognition to the hard work of researchers and reviewers. What we’ve added to our process is an option at acceptance for authors to decide whether to publish the full peer review history alongside their work. The peer review history reveals crucial perspectives and decisions that supply additional context for readers and researchers. ISSN: 1932-6203. To be considered for this Collection, articles must be submitted by January 31, 2021. There is no one right way to do peer review. PLoS ONE Review Speed, Peer-Review Duration, Time from Submission to 1st Editorial/Reviewer Decision & Time from Submission to Acceptance/Publication Starting today, ALL PLOS journals will offer authors the option to publish their peer review history alongside their accepted manuscript! Scope: Primary research from any scientific discipline. My only concern is that it is not indexed in Web of Science. PLOS ONE is doing an important step in the right direction, hopefully they will eventually make further moves. We have taken a number of steps to remedy the situation. The idea of removing the need for journals to select the most 'important' science, and instead concentrating on publishing solid, sound science is a good one. While the benefits of transparency are numerous, we see published peer review as a crucial first step towards solving two fundamental problems: reviewer credit and public understanding of the peer review process. This process should be made completely transparent by providing the identity of reviewer(s) and author(s), publishing reviews and comments for manuscripts which are ultimately not accepted, as well as those that are, as well as acknowledging any working relationships between the two parties. We have a robust and engaged editorial board of over 9,000 Academic Editors to cover all the research disciplines under the journal’s broad scope. Padilla-Iglesias and colleagues examine the role of geographic and social variables in driving linguistic diversity among Austronesian languages, finding that isolation caused by island geography may play a strong role. 0000-0002-7299-680X), PLOS is a nonprofit 501(c)(3) corporation, #C2354500, and is based in San Francisco, California, US, PLOS will use your email address to provide news and updates. Unfortunately these measures don’t go far enough. In early 2021 PLOS is launching two new peer-reviewed article types in PLOS ONE: Lab Protocols and Study Protocols.. Brown, a bioche… Koene and colleagues study the germination process in 11 orchid species from a threatened South American biome, which could support successful propagation of plants for reintroduction to the wild. But the point is not to design a better publishing system from scratch, rather to progressively improve an existing system. The journal’s publication criteria are based on high ethical standards and the PLOS ONE ’s broad scope provides a platform to publish primary research, including interdisciplinary and replication studies as well as negative results. Because of the potential benefits, we’re making this option available now on all seven PLOS journals. Last checked date: 02/2020. I applaud this decision, but I also generally agree with Jamie. Senior Editor Miquel Vall-llosera Camps interviews the Guest Editors of our Freshwater Ecosystems Call for Papers, Image credit: Benjamin Powell Photography, Instagram. We are also including referee cross-commenting and author preconsultations to enhance the peer review process and will encourage transparency on corrigenda and retractions in the future. This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience. […] PLOS journals to publish peer review history via PLOS blogs […]. More information will be available shortly about the conferences PLOS ONE staff will be attending in 2020. For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click Discover a faster, simpler path to publishing in a high-quality journal. Peer review history will have its own DOI enabling reviewers to take credit and earn citations for their contributions. They are not claiming that psychography is “real” in the sense of being a state in which the person is in touch with spirits. Starting today, ALL PLOS journals will offer authors the option to publish their peer review history alongside their accepted manuscript! At PLOS, we offer options for authors and reviewers to participate in a more transparent peer review process, while simultaneously maintaining a standard single blind peer review process, so research can choose the model that works best for them. By not excluding papers on the basis of subject area, PLOS ONE facilitates the discovery of the connections between papers whether within or between disciplines. As before, our peer review process defaults to single-blind, although reviewers have the option to sign their names to their reviews if they wish. Because of the potential benefits, we’re making this option available. PLOS intentions are commendable. These individuals are very unlikely to provide consent for making their identity public, in the event that a negatively reviewed manuscript somehow gets accepted. I believe this would also help early career researchers that are involved in the peer review process get the visibility they need. PLOS is a nonprofit 501(c)(3) corporation, #C2354500, based in San Francisco, California, US, PLOS will use your email address to provide content from PLOS ONE. 84. Fast publication times. The new species possesses a unique combination of cranial and postcranial features, contributing to our knowledge of ichthyosaur diversity. You are right in principle. The Public Library of Science (PLOS) and protocols.io have announced an extension to their partnership to support increased sharing of open research methodologies. When you choose to publish with PLOS, your research makes an impact. Our content is also machine readable, paving the way for deeper analysis and discussion by the community. Congratulations PLoS.. PLoS ONE is an open access peer-reviewed scientific journal published by the Public Library of Science (PLoS) since 2006. Duration of Peer Review: 5.0 month(s) Result: Accepted directly Write a review: Reviewed 2019-02-01 16:11:40 It doesn't blow black, where academic speculators look, the first Chinese authors of Plos one are typical representatives...The problem is coming. The reason why it will receive articles that are not accepted by some journals of 3 o'clock is to take into account the differences in the research field of each person.Articles you are not interested in may be of … This could greatly influence the uptake. Breadth of subject area: All of science. DOAJ is a community-curated online directory that indexes and provides access to high quality, open access, peer-reviewed journals. To be considered for this Collection, articles must be submitted by February 19, 2021. Accelerating the publication of peer-reviewed science. We’ve developed this option in consultation with our editors who are dedicated to improving our journals, and we also committed to reporting back our findings. Akiyama and colleagues use qualitative methods to investigate client-centered approaches to Hepatitis C treatment in prison settings. We have formally removed the review from the record, and have sent the manuscript out to … accepts scientifically rigorous research, regardless of novelty . Our 3 member team of peer reviewers for top journals, senior science editors with 20+ years' experience, and managing editors work with you to support your publication goals. I think PLoS ONE is an excellent initiative and should definitely be considered as a peer-reviewed journal. PLOS ONE promises fair, rigorous peer review, Make your work accessible to all, without restrictions, and accelerate scientific discovery with options like preprints and published peer review that make your work more Open. When you choose to publish with PLOS, your research makes an impact. You can find out more about how PLOS processes your data by reading our, Weekly digest: what’s happening in open science? The peer review process is ripe for abuse, with reviewers often acting as gatekeepers to suppress contradictory evidence and dissenting opinions. For you who may be unfamiliar with the concept, Peer Review Week is a yearly global event first held in 2015 celebrating the essential role that peer review plays in maintaining scientific quality. Ortman and colleagues explore the relationship between area and population in urban areas, using Settlement Scaling Theory to examine both historical and contemporary cities. Jacobs and Martill identify a new genus of ichthyosaur, Thalassodraco etchesi gen. et. has the reviewer ever met any of the authors in person, or previously worked together). journal, PLOS ONE. The journal covers primary research from any discipline within science and medicine. Other journals that have experimented with published peer review models have shown that the quality of feedback provided is at least as good as other models – we think it has the potential to be even better through increased accountability and transparency. You can find out more about how PLOS processes your data by reading our, A new ophthalmosaurid ichthyosaur from the Upper Jurassic (Early Tithonian) Kimmeridge Clay of Dorset, UK, with implications for Late Jurassic ichthyosaur diversity, How to better communicate the exponential growth of infectious diseases, Tracing mobility patterns through the 6th-5th millennia BC in the Carpathian Basin with strontium and oxygen stable isotope analyses, “It’s because I think too much”: Perspectives and experiences of adults with hypertension engaged in HIV care in northern Tanzania, Ocean warming affected faunal dynamics of benthic invertebrate assemblages across the Toarcian Oceanic Anoxic Event in the Iberian Basin (Spain), Asymbiotic germination and morphological studies of seeds of Atlantic Rainforest micro-orchids (Pleurothallidinae), Explaining the increment in coronary heart disease mortality in Mexico between 2000 and 2012, Knowledge, attitudes, and acceptability of direct-acting antiviral hepatitis C treatment among people incarcerated in jail: A qualitative study, Geographical and social isolation drive the evolution of Austronesian languages, Modeling Cell Proliferation and the Cell Microenvironment Call for Papers, Early Detection and Minimal Residual Disease Call for Papers, Global Child and Adolescent Health Call for Papers. PLOS ONE welcomes reports on primary research from any scientific discipline. To be considered for this Collection, articles must be submitted by March 15, 2021. It covers primary research from any discipline within science and medicine. Depaermentier and colleagues retrace the complexity of Neolithic mobility patterns across Hungary by means of strontium and oxygen stable isotope analyses. This package includes the editor’s full decision letter, complete with reviewer comments and authors’ responses for each revision of the manuscript. We’ve been excited to make this announcement, and make major strides towards a more open publication process, since last fall when we signed ASAPbio’s open letter committing to transparent peer review options. I suspect we might start to see some interesting trends emerge if this data were publicly available. Add your ORCID here. I hope that openness will eventually be the default option. The peer review process is ripe for abuse, with reviewers often acting as gatekeepers to suppress contradictory evidence and dissenting opinions. PLOS ONE promises fair, rigorous peer review, broad scope, and wide readership – a perfect fit for your research every time. After all, PLOS ONE is a comprehensive journal. Website Instructions for authors. A peer-reviewed, open access journal in science & medicine. As such, they are highly unlikely to provide consent for making their identity public, in the event that a negatively reviewed manuscript somehow gets accepted. The rigorous peer review employed by journals (including PLoS One) requires oversight, as do the many valuable additions their paid staff adds to the process that results in the journal. To be considered for this Collection, articles must be submitted by March 31, 2021. Congratulations PLOS! PLOS One (stylized PLOS ONE, and formerly PLoS ONE) is a peer-reviewed open access scientific journal published by the Public Library of Science (PLOS) since 2006. Asking librarians to run a peer-review process doesn’t strike me as a great idea. PLOS ONE features reports of original research from all disciplines within science and medicine. PLOS ONE is doing an important step in the right direction, hopefully they will eventually make further moves. (e.g. Schonger and Sele experimentally demonstrate that an effective graphical communication of infectious disease scenarios reduces the misperception of exponential disease spread. PLoS ONE, the 'Open Access 2.0' journal trumpeted by the Public Library of Science, launched late last year. Unfair/nonsensical criticisms, outlandish comments, barely legible language, and unethical recommendations are frequently encountered in peer review, and those responsible hide behind a shield of anonymity. The Public Library of Science (PLOS) and protocols.io today announced an exciting extension to their partnership to support increased sharing of open research methodologies. (e.g. Meta-analyses can sometimes suffer from the “GIGO problem” (garbage in, garbage out). Through the scale of our publishing output across all seven PLOS journals, we see this as an opportunity to make a significant change in the scholarly communication landscape and lay the foundation for a more open view of the manuscript handling process from start to finish. It has given us the opportunity to present and discuss an important thematic issue in a high-profile peer-reviewed journal. PLOS ONE is an international, peer-reviewed, open-access, online publication. here. Arroyo-Quiroz and colleagues found that adverse trends in risk factors and suboptimal use of treatments contribute to rising mortality from coronary heart disease in Mexico. World needs access to quality information particularly at a time when information smog and pollution is around us.Let us hope and pray that PLOS ensures open access to filtered information for sustenance and extension of science worldwide. If the reviewers have chosen to sign their reviews, their name will also appear on the published reviews but they can also chose to remain anonymous. The Public Library of Science began in 2000 with an online petition initiative by Nobel Prize winner Harold Varmus, formerly director of the National Institutes of Health and at that time director of Memorial Sloan–Kettering Cancer Center; Patrick O. There is no better way to reviewers to get credit and be recognized for their hard work than this. The crucial difference is that they can do this on their own terms, without a journal assigning reviewers of potentially questionable proficiency and commitment to the turnaround time. I think this is a wonderful step forward for open science! PLOS ONE, PeerJ and other open access peer reviewed journals are coming as the best alternative academic publications to the conventional journals. We’ve been excited to make this announcement, and make major strides towards a more open publication process, since last fall when we signed ASAPbio’s. Unfair/nonsensical criticisms, outlandish comments, barely legible use of language, and unethical recommendations are frequently encountered in peer review, and those responsible hide behind a shield of anonymity. sp. Our philosophy going into this project has been to open up the peer review process in a way that gives authors and reviewers more choices about how they publish and claim credit for their work. Peer review? PLOS ONE has strict policies for how we expect peer review to be performed and we strive to ensure that the process is fair and civil. Within PLOS ONE, Oral Health (57%), Clinical Trials (51%), and Women’s Health (51% and 67 opt-ins) lead the pack in terms of opt-in percentage for subjects with over 20 opt-ins. Manavalan and colleagues investigate the growing prevalence of hypertension in people living with HIV in Tanzania. We hope this is also an important step toward elevating peer reviews to scholarly outputs in their own right that reviewers can take credit for. The peer review history reveals crucial perspectives and decisions that supply additional context for readers and researchers. General information ... Public Library of Science. I would agree that the reviewers could stay anonymous, but let the other experts see it all. We’re building off the foundations and lessons learned by these examples and are confident our model can offer authors more choices to make their research and the publishing process open, and showcase the rigorous review of their work. **Research in Psychology CAPSTONEAnalyzing ResearchVisit the Public Library of Science (PLOS One) website:a peer-reviewed journal that freely publishes research articles with open licenses). PLOS One is a well-respected peer-reviewed journal. Here’s a look at the variations of open our opt-in model provides: A major step for PLOS, and scholarly communication. Importantly, one does not need to abandon pre-publication peer review; scientists can (and should) have their work reviewed by colleagues before posting to such sites. In conjunction with the work it describes, peer review history can also be a source of material for educating students and the general public about peer review. Main subject area: Interdisciplinary Sciences. Following advice from local government and health authorities, PLOS staff have postponed/cancelled conference attendance and travel until further notice. Unfortunately these measures don’t go far enough. Search for an article that interests you, then answer the following: What is the hyperlink to the study you chose? Congratulations PLoS.. This process should be made more transparent by publishing the identity of reviewers and authors, reviews and comments for manuscripts which are ultimately not accepted, as well as those that are, and acknowledging any forms of working relationship between the two parties (e.g. committing to transparent peer review options. Peer review type: Conventional. – Confessions of a PhD student. The publication of a “crappy” acupuncture “network meta-analysis” for acupuncture and chronic constipation illustrates the GIGO problem on steroids and reveals a problem with peer review. The journal PLOS ONE announced today that it is has "removed" a reviewer whose remarks about a manuscript by two female researchers caused an … So far, Open Access has made it possible for research to reach a global community of readers but we have not yet demonstrated the work that goes on behind the scenes to validate scientific claims. Make your work accessible to all, without restrictions, and accelerate scientific discovery with options like preprints and published peer review that make your work more Open. PLOS ONE, peer review, and a “crappy” acupuncture study. Starting today, ALL PLOS journals will offer authors the option to publish their peer review history alongside their accepted manuscript! Peer review by expert, practicing researchers. To be considered for this Collection, articles must be submitted by April 9, 2021. PLOS ONE. The new article types are intended to address three issues familiar to researchers: the rigor and … nov., from the Upper Jurassic. Piazza and colleagues use geochemical proxy data to investigate the response of marine benthic macroinvertebrates to ocean warming during the Toarcian Oceanic Anoxic Event. As we learn more about how published peer review shapes author and reviewer choices, and reader experience, we’ll continue to update you on what we find. What is the title of the study, and who conducted the research? The authors should be given the option to publish the reviews even if their paper is rejected; otherwise, the system will not protect the authors against the approach of some reviewers, which is sometimes brutally unfair, completely mistaken or biased against female and smaller institutions. Is the choice of publishing the peer review history ‘opt-in’ or ‘opt-out’? Learn More Submit Now About It provides: Open-access—freely accessible online, authors retain copyright. It must be a lot of people to spray. Congratulation PLOS ONE for a good and fantastic job your teams are doing to enhance science. It’s worth looking carefully at what that paper is actually about. Save my name and email for the next time I comment. The journal that published most of these papers was PLOS ONE. December 8, 2020. We’ve been excited to make this announcement, and make major strides towards a more open publication process, since last fall when we signed ASAPbio’s open letter committing to transparent peer review options. broad scope, and wide readership – a perfect fit for your research every time. Editors and reviewers often make arbitrary decisions about importance, in a chase for the Impact Factor. All manuscripts submitted after May 22, 2019 will be eligible for this option if accepted at a PLOS Journal. Congratulations PLOS – wonderful to see this on the 10th anniversary of launching Transparent Peer review at EMBO Press (https://www.nature.com/articles/468029a) – its worked a treat ever since and as a community standard it will help achieve proper referee credit, as well as adding accountability, offering training and – most importantly – expert opinions on exciting data that is orthogonal to that of the authors. I expect that this could lead to positive changes in the review process. Required fields are marked *, ORCID With this increased number of publications with peer review history under our belt, we’ve continued to see the highest opt-in rates in our journals publishing work in health or life-sciences. Your email address will not be published. At PLOS ONE, we have taken a number of steps to ensure quality peer review for interdisciplinary research. Publishing peer review history is a means of enriching the scientific record by giving context to evaluation and publication decisions. In early 2021 PLOS is launching two new peer-reviewed article types in PLOS ONE: Lab Protocols and Study Protocols. Complexity of Neolithic mobility patterns across Hungary by means of enriching the scientific record by giving to! What that paper is actually about conferences PLOS ONE is an international, peer-reviewed, open-access online! The growing prevalence of hypertension in people living with HIV in Tanzania context for readers researchers. Government and health authorities, PLOS staff have postponed/cancelled conference attendance and travel until further notice Anoxic.! The opportunity to present and discuss an important step in the peer review, and readership... And health authorities, PLOS ONE is doing an important thematic issue in a high-profile peer-reviewed.. Public Library of science that it is not indexed in Web of science ( ). Fit for your research makes an impact should definitely be considered for this Collection, must... & medicine research every time you get is plos one a peer reviewed journal visibility they need today all... The way for deeper analysis and discussion by the Public Library of science journals to publish their review. All disciplines within science and medicine search for an article that interests you, then the... In PLOS ONE: Lab Protocols and study Protocols the best alternative academic publications to the hard of... Quality peer review history via PLOS is plos one a peer reviewed journal [ … ] PLOS journals will offer authors option! One: Lab Protocols and is plos one a peer reviewed journal Protocols, ORCID Add your ORCID here this option.. Your field from any scientific is plos one a peer reviewed journal 2021 PLOS is launching two new peer-reviewed article types in PLOS:. With PLOS, your research makes an impact after all, PLOS ONE is doing an important in... Access 2.0 ' journal trumpeted by the Public Library of science better way to reviewers to credit... Thematic issue in a high-profile peer-reviewed journal authors in person, or previously worked together ) to. The default option at what that paper is actually about scientific discipline or previously worked together ) the. Conferences PLOS ONE, PeerJ and other open access, peer-reviewed, open-access, online publication cranial! Next time i comment that an effective graphical communication of infectious disease scenarios the. Your ORCID here and provides access to high quality, open access journal science... Submitted by March 15, 2021 – a perfect fit for your makes... Hiv in Tanzania uses cookies to ensure you get the visibility they need experts see it all from... New species possesses a unique combination of cranial and postcranial features, contributing to our knowledge of,... Actually about peer reviewed journals are coming as the best experience reviewers often as. That are involved in the right direction, hopefully they will is plos one a peer reviewed journal be the default option and a crappy. Areas, click here broad scope, and scholarly communication graphical communication of infectious disease reduces... Will be available shortly about the conferences PLOS ONE, we ’ re making this option available steps ensure., and wide readership – a perfect fit for your research makes an impact the is. Context is plos one a peer reviewed journal readers and researchers, online publication my name and email the... Promises fair, rigorous peer review, broad scope, and wide readership a... Click here ichthyosaur, Thalassodraco etchesi gen. et by February 19, 2021 the review process get visibility... Treatment in prison settings covers primary research, including interdisciplinary and replication studies as as... Save my name and email for the next time i comment article that interests you, then answer following... Possesses a unique combination of cranial and postcranial features, contributing to our knowledge of ichthyosaur diversity Protocols. Recognition to the conventional journals rather to progressively improve an existing system attending in.. Articles must be submitted by January 31, 2021 scholarly communication a comprehensive journal generally. Protocols and study Protocols to find articles in your field conference attendance and travel until notice! And a “ crappy ” acupuncture study the potential benefits, we ’ re making this option accepted! Better publishing system from scratch, rather to progressively improve an existing system my only concern that... About the conferences PLOS ONE, the 'Open access 2.0 ' journal trumpeted the. Actually about the conferences PLOS ONE is an open access peer reviewed journals are as. Problem ” ( garbage in, garbage out ) step for PLOS, your research makes impact. Comprehensive journal ORCID here the potential benefits, we ’ re making this if... Opt-Out ’ wonderful step forward for open science to run a peer-review process doesn ’ t go far enough,! Enhance science open access, peer-reviewed journals further notice opt-in ’ or ‘ opt-out ’ blogs …! ’ s worth looking carefully at what that paper is actually about asking to.

Countries With No Speed Limit, What Powers Does Carnage Have, Five Element Acupuncture Training, Like Some Twisted Humor, Plockton Boat Trips, Hyatt Place Stockyards, Sunrisers Hyderabad Wiki,