They will not become the most prestigious journals in academia while rejection rates are so generally low. The publishing time is also fast, indeed good for the authors. Thank you for your advice. Of course, I got a response to this, including " We also check the quality of review reports. " This journal has been indexed in PubMed since 2008. Most of MDPI journals are indexed. So l would appreciate sharing some ideas on this last point. Of course there are more prestigious outlets, but they are not for everybody and not everybody wants to wait 2 years to get a paper accepted (especially when you have 3-years to finish your PhD). They seem to have an efficient peer review system in place and are transparent about their article processing fees. Thus there is a balance to be struck and for both authors and referees to keep the practices of journals and publishers under constant review. Answered by Editage Insights They simply asked, not based on such trust. on 27 Nov, 2018, Some critical views expressed in https://www.researchgate.net/post/Im_gonna_ask_whether_publishing_in_MDPI_journals_is_good_or_more_specifically_how_is_publishing_in_International_Journal_of_Molecular_Sciences, Answered by Jari Vauhkonen Yes its true. They are a little bit stressed on their deadlines both for reviewers and authors which is not so good. I got rejected and accepted papers with some of my students. Everything went quick, smoothly and appeared to be professional. MDPI has opted to debunk the unnecessary delays prominent with journal publications. I have published two papers in one of their journals and I must say that their peer review process is fast, efficient and robust. IJMS is okay to go with. § 3. Their paper get citation because of open access and networking. Do major Elsevier Journals manipulate Impact Factors at large scale? The last two paragraphs are just bizzare, but the first one is quite shocking. I have recently published a paper in their latest journal 'Sci' a post publication peer review journal that bears a lot of similarity to F1000 research. Reviewers should not accept work if they cannot do it in such a period. But, I could not state a longer review period in their provided form. And they have contacted authors (. Can you imagine the amount of resources the academic system would need for the consideration, reading, and use of 10.000 new articles per year in this journal alone? What I certainly do not recommend to do is submitting to any journals published by E-Cronicon, which I had quite a bad experience with. Like others, I've published with MDPI a few times. ... Journal of MDPI Sensors, 2010. Sure, it is not one of these very high quality journal, but sometimes I prefer to be published in 30 days in a good enough journal, rather than waiting 2 years for a reject in a very good journal. In turn, someone else publishes similar research before you and all your efforts can be thrown in the dustbin. I am not an attorney of MDPI :), however, what you have written (with all my respect) is absolutely incorrect. For MDPI, some of its journals are good while others seem to be like the Editor makes the final decision on a paper. As it has been received impact factor from July 1, 2018, they have increased its price to 850 CHF. Regarding review time, I think it should not take more than a week to provide a good review by a reviewer. Journals should be fast to disseminate knowledge and research timely. I have had several negative experiences as a reviewer for MDPI journals and several uneventful experiences. Nevertheless from this information I must take it that different journals are managed differently. MDPI journals are very fast, they provide well peer-reviewed reports perfectly, within 03-04 weeks and editors are cooperative. I feel that this is at least one company that respects the time you take to do these carefully in a measurable way (as opposed to being thanked annually in an issue). Perhaps, one day i will write an article, where i will share my own experience with the peer review process. One should be able to make their own conclusions. MDPI is one of the largest free-to-read journal platforms, with scholarly articles that have been indexed in leading databases. As well, publisher MDPI disputes some of the claims in the article. The quality of paper Microorganisms publishes is also good. I recommend to you again the link provided above by Derek Pyne in which the key ongoing issues regarding MDPI are neatly summarised: If you agree, please scroll up under 'All answers' and recommend Derek's contribution. Had 3 colleagues' manuscripts rejected and they were wondering how do I publish with them. [CDATA[> [CDATA[> In other words, likely your friend, colleague or compatriot would be much less critical compared to an independent reviewer, which creates dishonest practices. They ignore the reviewer's comment who reject a paper which is lengthy of their point although technically not sound by reviewer. The discussion could continue, but I stopped, seeing no point in continuing it .... Also, there is one thing that I do not understand: why do APC of their journals depend on existence and value of IF? I usually use less than that amount. MDPI is a fully open access publisher, that is, all their journals operate exclusively on the open access model. online indicated mixed views shared by researchers and reviewers based on their experiences, such as: Simple steps authors can follow to protect their research from predatory publishers, https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/5466/is-mdpi-a-reputable-academic-publisher, https://www.researchgate.net/post/Im_gonna_ask_whether_publishing_in_MDPI_journals_is_good_or_more_specifically_how_is_publishing_in_International_Journal_of_Molecular_Sciences, How to identify predatory publishers- A Checklist, Think Check Submit- The checklist that helps you choose a reliable journal. Later on, the editor also invited me to review someone's else manuscript. Briefly, I have been repeatedly asked to submit an article to EC Pulmonology and Respiratory Medicine. They are fast ad they make published papers available on line very quickly what might threat other journals as they go down while MDPI goes up. Importantly, they left all papers from the stand along MDPI Journal Neuroglia available online to view and download. The Free Dictionary. !? Useful. Is it any good? Do you think the impact factor given by this journal is real? For example, I had a rejection in 8 hours, an acceptance in 2 days, a rejection in 9 months, and an acceptance in 18 months. I found this thread because I was asked to review a paper for one of their journals. Based on this and the publisher's controversial reputation, I think that I will decline. Nothing, I paid nothing - each of them was gratis. But, the answer was "[...] is an open access journal and fast editorial process is our feature advance. You've already flagged this Nicky 17 reviews. I do not believe that MDPI is a predatory publisher. @Georgiy, how can you justify MDPI is predatory????? And then I ask myself, how do they do it? Some papers in MDPI journals are excellent and highly cited. My experience was that MDPI was quite rigorous, thorough and transparent. This surprised me, as according to WoS, the IF of the journal is quite decent. I felt it predatory or, at the very least, spamming. My feedback apparently was not taken into consideration. Current Oncology, Canada's Premier Oncology Journal, Published with MDPI from 2021 (2020-11-02) 1000 Reprint Books Published in 2020 (2020-10-23) Emmanuelle Charpentier and Jennifer A. Doudna Awarded 2020 Nobel Prize in Chemistry for the Development of a … This is why you should be selective about the journal in which you hope to publish as many of the journals out there are only interested in making money from article processing charges.

Rio 2 Nigel, Rossland Hiking Trails Map, Huawei B535 Vs B525, Fir Tree Meaning In Tamil, Hp Warranty Claim Phone Number, Iom Office In California, Female Indie Pop Artists, Enbridge Line 5 Spills,